![]() |
![]() |
| <office@sarahludfordmep.org.uk> | Sarah Ludford MEP | 3rd September 2010 |
Family Reunion Rights and Guantanamo BaySpeech by Sarah Ludford MEP delivered to European Parliament on Wed 3rd Dec 2003 Mr President, the President-in-Office of Council said that the European Union will not fail to give a welcome to legal migrants. This looks hypocritical since the Council agreed a very restrictive text on family reunion rights. Indeed it is so mean, that the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market advises that the European Parliament should seek the annulment of this text in the European Court on grounds of a breach of the family rights provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. I welcome that. The Council has been left in no doubt as to the strength of feeling in this House about the internment without due process of Guantanamo Bay prisoners. As co-rapporteur on this topic, I am helping to prepare a submission from this Parliament to the Supreme Court, but only the Council can make representations on behalf of the EU as a whole. It has already signed a legal cooperation agreement with the US, so the Americans cannot dispute the Council's legal status. It would be outrageous if governments - such as the UK Government - doing bilateral deals frustrated a Council initiative. Even if we get Europeans back from Guantanamo Bay, we must speak up for the rest of the 650 detainees. As we are showing on steel tariffs, if the EU punches its weight, the US takes notice. Related Links:News story about Guantanamo Bay. News story about family reunion rights.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Thu 26th Jun 2008: US court boost for Guantanamo prisoners' rights. Tue 9th Mar 2004: MEPs defend Guantanamo detainee rights. Wed 14th Jan 2004: Guantanamo Families form Human Rights Commission. Wed 16th Jul 2003: Published and promoted by Ashley Lumsden on behalf of Baroness Sarah Ludford MEP and the Liberal Democrats, all at 4 Cowley Street, London SW1P 3NB. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |